← Use cases

Security / IAM

Complements your identity & secrets stack

You already run an identity provider and a secrets / non-human-identity platform — they issue the agent’s token and govern which credentials exist. Neither decides whether a given agent action should run, or proves that it did.

Real example — shipping today

source →

Okta + Entro · identity provider · NHI & secrets security

Okta (Auth for GenAI / Auth0 for AI Agents) issues the verified token an agent authenticates with; NHI platforms like Entro (SailPoint) discover and secure the machine identities, API keys, and secrets it could use. Together they answer who could act, with what.

Their own controls — they authenticate agents, issue short-lived verifiable tokens, and inventory and rotate the underlying secrets.

The danger without a gate

Securing which identities and secrets exist is necessary but not sufficient: it doesn’t decide whether THIS agent call, with THIS payload, should run — or leave a tamper-evident, before-execution record that it did. That is a different layer.

How MCPIP handles it, step by step

Read it top to bottom. Each step shows the real command and exactly what MCPIP returns — the same allow / step-up / denied envelope every time.

1

Your identity & secrets stack governs who could act

Okta (or Auth0 for AI Agents) issues the verified token the agent authenticates with, and an NHI platform like Entro — or Aembit, or HashiCorp Vault — inventories and rotates the secrets behind it. That’s the standing posture: who could act, with what.

2

MCPIP governs the action, per call

When the agent actually invokes a tool, MCPIP authorizes THIS request on THIS payload — the decision your identity/secrets layer doesn’t make — and holds the high-risk ones for approval.

bash
$ mcpip --json authorize skill_dynamodb_write --arg item_id=ord-9912
step-up requiredwhat mcpip returns
{
  "error": "step_up_pending",
  "challenge_id": "chg_11ce02",
  "correlation_id": "3d7a09b1"
}
3

And it produces the before-execution proof

Every decision is sealed to the signed WORM chain before it runs. That tamper-evident, ordered record is the layer NHI and secrets tools don’t produce — and exactly what auditors ask for.

bash
$ mcpip --json complete --challenge chg_11ce02
allowwhat mcpip returns
{
  "decision": "allow",
  "status": "executed",
  "transaction_ref": "txn_7c2a55",
  "executed_target_class": "cloud_iam",
  "worm_sequence": 48223,
  "correlation_id": "3d7a09b1"
}

The result

Your NHI/secrets stack stays the source of truth for identity; MCPIP is the per-call authorizer and the write-before-execute audit for the action.

complementaryper-call authzpayload PINWORM

The same flow, at a glance

OKTA / ENTROAGENTMCPIPSYSTEMidentity + secretswho could actauthorize THIS callwhat actually runsper-call authz · PIN · sealexecute

Every command above runs against a local sandbox in one line.

run it yourself — curl … | bash && mcpip up →